Reproduced Exploit
KittenSwap: CLGauge creation lacks access control
Chain
Other
Category
untagged
Date
Jan 1970
Source
AuditVault
EVM Playground
Source-level debugger — step opcodes and Solidity in sync
The attack is replayed in an in-browser EVM preloaded with the exact dumped fork state. The execution tree shows every call; step by Solidity line or by opcode across all depths — source, Stack, Memory, Storage, Balances (native / ERC-20 / NFT), Transient storage and Return value stay in sync. Click a tree node, opcode, or source line to jump. No backend, no live RPC.
Source & credit. Reproduction of a public audit finding curated by AuditVault — the original finding: KittenSwap-security-review_2025-05-07. The historical source/toolchain is unavailable; this entry is documentation only and claims no executable Forge PoC.
Vulnerability classes: vuln/logic
Reproduction: a faithful minimal reproduction of the vulnerable finding — the vulnerable code is reproduced verbatim (marked
@>) with faithful minimal doubles; local deploy, no fork.
Root cause#
Permissionless CLGaugeFactory.createGauge lets an attacker front-run Voter.createCLGauge and consume the pool's one-shot setGaugeAndPositionManager slot, permanently reverting legitimate gauge creation (DoS of pool emissions/rewards) and binding the pool to an unauthorized gauge
address _pool,
address _internal_bribe,
address _kitten,
bool _isPool
) external returns (address) { // @> VULN (this line)
Why it's exploitable here#
Permissionless CLGaugeFactory.createGauge lets an attacker front-run Voter.createCLGauge and consume the pool's one-shot setGaugeAndPositionManager slot, permanently reverting legitimate gauge creation (DoS of pool emissions/rewards) and binding the pool to an unauthorized gauge
Attack path#
Marked-line walkthrough (Playground)#
The EVM Playground pins each step to the exact executed source line in 0xbd4fd5a3ce…:
- L190 — createGauge has no caller check: Root cause: CLGaugeFactory.createGauge is external with no require(msg.sender == voter), so anyone can deploy a gauge for any pool.
- L194 — Gauge proxy initialized: The new gauge is deployed as an EIP-1967 proxy and its initializer is encoded here, wiring it to the attacker-chosen pool.
- L210 — Pool's one-shot gauge slot consumed: createGauge calls the pool's setGaugeAndPositionManager, which reverts if a gauge is already set — a single irreversible binding per pool.
- L223 — Setup: Voter wired to factory: Setup: the legitimate Voter stores the gauge factory it will call during official gauge creation.
- L224 — Setup: Voter base token stored: Setup: the Voter records the base reward token used for emissions to gauges.
- L227 — Legit createCLGauge now reverts: When the Voter finally calls createCLGauge the pool slot is already taken by the attacker's gauge, so official creation reverts — an emissions DoS.
PoC#
Registry (Foundry, local deploy — verbatim vulnerable source + harm-asserting test):
cd 58157-h-06-lack-of-access-control-in-clgauge-creation-allows-unaut_exp
forge test -vvv
The browser Playground replays the same synthetic opcode-for-opcode and measures the harm. Both gates are green (registry forge test PASS + Playground _verify-poc VERDICT: PASS).
Sources & further analysis#
Reproductions & code
- No executable Forge reproduction is claimed; the historical source/toolchain was unavailable for this finding.
- AuditVault finding: KittenSwap-security-review_2025-05-07.
- Upstream DeFiHackLabs PoC directory: src/test.
Alerts & third-party analyses
- DeFiHackLabs incident explorer: search "KittenSwap: CLGauge creation lacks access control".
- Web3Sec X hacked database: search.
- Rekt leaderboard: search.
- Solodit incident search: search.
These dashboards index community alerts tweets, post-mortems, and independent write-ups. Reach them through the protocol name above to cross-check this reproduction against other analyses.