Reproduced Exploit
KittenSwap: CLGauge sends staking rewards to itself
Chain
Other
Category
untagged
Date
Jan 1970
Source
AuditVault
EVM Playground
Source-level debugger — step opcodes and Solidity in sync
The attack is replayed in an in-browser EVM preloaded with the exact dumped fork state. The execution tree shows every call; step by Solidity line or by opcode across all depths — source, Stack, Memory, Storage, Balances (native / ERC-20 / NFT), Transient storage and Return value stay in sync. Click a tree node, opcode, or source line to jump. No backend, no live RPC.
Source & credit. Reproduction of a public audit finding curated by AuditVault — the original finding: KittenSwap-security-review_2025-05-07. The historical source/toolchain is unavailable; this entry is documentation only and claims no executable Forge PoC.
Vulnerability classes: vuln/logic
Reproduction: a faithful minimal reproduction of the vulnerable finding — the vulnerable code is reproduced verbatim (marked
@>) with faithful minimal doubles; local deploy, no fork.
Root cause#
CLGauge._getReward derives the reward recipient from nfp.ownerOf(nfpTokenId), which after staking is the gauge itself; the KITTEN reward is self-transferred gauge->gauge, the staker receives 0 and 100% of rewards are stranded/lost
uint256 reward = rewards[nfpTokenId];
address owner = nfp.ownerOf(nfpTokenId); // @> VULN (this line)
Why it's exploitable here#
CLGauge._getReward derives the reward recipient from nfp.ownerOf(nfpTokenId), which after staking is the gauge itself; the KITTEN reward is self-transferred gauge->gauge, the staker receives 0 and 100% of rewards are stranded/lost
Attack path#
Marked-line walkthrough (Playground)#
The EVM Playground pins each step to the exact executed source line in 0xce01759b82…:
- L135 — Setup: staker recorded on deposit: Setup: when a user stakes their NFP position the gauge records the real staker address in staker[nfpTokenId].
- L149 — Setup: reward accrual bookkeeping: Setup: reward accounting for the staked position is updated before any rewards are paid out.
- L153 — Setup: safe-transfer contract check: Setup: the Solidly-style safe-transfer helper first checks the token address actually holds contract code.
- L162 — Setup: low-level transferFrom helper: Setup: rewards are moved with a low-level transferFrom whose from/to addresses are supplied by the caller.
- L171 — Reward claim updates accounting: On _getReward the position's pending reward is finalized before the recipient address is resolved.
- L174 — Recipient read from NFP owner: Root cause: the reward recipient is nfp.ownerOf(nfpTokenId), but after staking the NFP owner is the gauge itself, not the staker.
- L179 — Reward self-transferred to gauge: KITTEN is transferred from the gauge to owner==gauge — a self-transfer — so the staker receives 0 and the whole reward is stranded.
PoC#
Registry (Foundry, local deploy — verbatim vulnerable source + harm-asserting test):
cd 58151-c-02-clgauge-sends-kitten-rewards-to-itself-instead-of-to-st_exp
forge test -vvv
The browser Playground replays the same synthetic opcode-for-opcode and measures the harm. Both gates are green (registry forge test PASS + Playground _verify-poc VERDICT: PASS).
Sources & further analysis#
Reproductions & code
- No executable Forge reproduction is claimed; the historical source/toolchain was unavailable for this finding.
- AuditVault finding: KittenSwap-security-review_2025-05-07.
- Upstream DeFiHackLabs PoC directory: src/test.
Alerts & third-party analyses
- DeFiHackLabs incident explorer: search "KittenSwap: CLGauge sends staking rewards to itself".
- Web3Sec X hacked database: search.
- Rekt leaderboard: search.
- Solodit incident search: search.
These dashboards index community alerts tweets, post-mortems, and independent write-ups. Reach them through the protocol name above to cross-check this reproduction against other analyses.