Reproduced Exploit

CAP Labs — decimal count creates an inaccurate staked price

The adapter multiplies by capTokenDecimals and divides by stakedTokenDecimals instead of applying 10decimals. Six- and eighteen-decimal assets therefore receive a nonsensical price.

May 2025Otherarithmetic3 min read

Chain

Other

Category

arithmetic

Date

May 2025

Source

AuditVault

EVM Playground

Source-level debugger — step opcodes and Solidity in sync

evm-hack-analyzer

The attack is replayed in an in-browser EVM preloaded with the exact dumped fork state. The execution tree shows every call; step by Solidity line or by opcode across all depths — source, Stack, Memory, Storage, Balances (native / ERC-20 / NFT), Transient storage and Return value stay in sync. Click a tree node, opcode, or source line to jump. No backend, no live RPC.

Loading fork state…

Source & credit. Reproduction of a public audit finding curated by AuditVault — the original finding: 61540-wrong-captokendecimals-value-used-in-stakedcapadapterprice-c. Standalone Foundry PoC and full write-up: 61540-stakedcap-decimals-price_exp in the evm-hack-registry mirror.


Vulnerability classes: vuln/arithmetic/decimal-mismatch · vuln/arithmetic/precision-loss · vuln/logic/price-calculation

Reproduction: Fully local synthetic; run forge test and inspect output.txt. The Playground bundle replays the same 61540-stakedcap-decimals-price invariant.

Key info#

FieldValue
LossPrice is mis-scaled by orders of magnitude, enabling incorrect collateral valuation
Vulnerable contractStakedCapAdapter (reconstructed)
Attacker EOA0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 (synthetic caller)
Attack contractExploit
Attack txLocal Exploit.run() call (no historical transaction)
Chain · block · dateEthereum · local stub 0x1181d03 · 2025-05
CompilerSolidity 0.8.35 (pragma ^0.8.24)
Bug classvuln/arithmetic/decimal-mismatch · vuln/arithmetic/precision-loss · vuln/logic/price-calculation

TL;DR#

The adapter multiplies by capTokenDecimals and divides by stakedTokenDecimals instead of applying 10**decimals. Six- and eighteen-decimal assets therefore receive a nonsensical price.

Background#

AuditVault finding 61540-stakedcap-decimals-price is an audit-time issue rather than a historical exploit. This write-up reduces the report to one state transition and keeps the claimed harm assertion executable offline.

The vulnerable code#

The minimized source is explicitly marked RECONSTRUCTED and preserves the report's blamed operation with an @> VULN marker in test/61540-stakedcap-decimals-price.sol. It is byte-identical to the Playground synthetic source. No verified production source was available in this local checkout.

Root cause#

A decimal count is treated as a scaling factor, collapsing 10^6/10^18 normalization into 6/18.

Preconditions#

The affected protocol path is deployed; the attacker can reach the public operation described in the report. The synthetic removes unrelated integrations while preserving the state and authorization assumptions required for the finding.

Attack walkthrough#

  1. For raw=2 ether, 6/18 decimals produce 666666666666666666 instead of the normalized 2,000,000.
  2. The run() method requires the broken invariant and sets confirmed; the Forge trace records a passing test at output.txt:355.
  3. The remediation is to validate the accounting/state transition before accepting the external call or to consume the one-time state.

Diagrams#

flowchart TD A["Attacker invokes public path"] --> B["Vulnerable state transition"] B --> C["Inconsistent accounting or revert"] C --> D["Reported protocol harm"]

Remediation#

Validate external addresses and returned balances before updating state, and make each one-time transition explicit. Add invariant tests covering zero/deflationary/epoch-boundary inputs.

How to reproduce#

BASH
cd 61540-stakedcap-decimals-price_exp
forge test -vvv

The browser replay uses scripts/poc-configs/61540-stakedcap-decimals-price.mjs and the same local-deploy Exploit contract.

Sources#


Sources & further analysis#

Reproductions & code

Alerts & third-party analyses

  • Web3Sec X hacked database: search.
  • Rekt leaderboard: search.
  • Solodit incident search: search.

These dashboards index community alerts tweets, post-mortems, and independent write-ups. Reach them through the protocol name above to cross-check this reproduction against other analyses.