Reproduced Exploit
Kinetiq deactivateValidator leaves 1,000 HYPE on the validator
deactivateValidator stores a rebalance request for the validator's balance and sets active to false. It never calls processValidatorWithdrawals. After deactivating a validator that holds 1,000 HYPE, the validator still holds 1,000 and the staking manager holds 0. The control calls the withdraw in t…
Loss
1,000 HYPE stays on the validator. The control pays 1,000 to the staking manager
Chain
Ethereum
Category
dos
Date
Feb 2025
Source
AuditVault
EVM Playground
Source-level debugger — step opcodes and Solidity in sync
The attack is replayed in an in-browser EVM preloaded with the exact dumped fork state. The execution tree shows every call; step by Solidity line or by opcode across all depths — source, Stack, Memory, Storage, Balances (native / ERC-20 / NFT), Transient storage and Return value stay in sync. Click a tree node, opcode, or source line to jump. No backend, no live RPC.
Source & credit. Reproduction of a public audit finding curated by AuditVault — the original finding: 58610-h-02-validatormanager-missing-fund-withdrawal-from-validator. Standalone Foundry PoC and full write-up: 58610-h-02-validatormanager-missing-fund-withdrawal-from-validator_exp in the
evm-hack-registrymirror.
Vulnerability classes: vuln/dos/frozen-funds · vuln/logic/missing-check
Key info#
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Loss | 1,000 HYPE stays on the validator. The control pays 1,000 to the staking manager |
| Vulnerable contract | StakingManager.deactivateValidator |
| Attacker EOA | 0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 |
| Attack contract | Exploit |
| Attack tx | Exploit.run() |
| Chain / block / date | Ethereum model · block 0 · 2025-02 |
| Compiler | solc 0.8.27, cancun, via IR |
| Bug class | Deactivate records a request and never withdraws |
TL;DR#
deactivateValidator stores a rebalance request for the validator's balance and sets active to false. It never calls processValidatorWithdrawals. After deactivating a validator that holds 1,000 HYPE, the validator still holds 1,000 and the staking manager holds 0. The control calls the withdraw in the same function and the manager receives 1,000.
The vulnerable code#
if (bal > 0) {
// @> VULN: a rebalance request is stored and the validator balance is never withdrawn.
requested = bal;
}
active = false;
The control then calls processValidatorWithdrawals, which pushes the balance to the manager.
Root cause#
The withdrawal request is only an accounting record. The HYPE sits on the validator account. Later closes of that request need the tokens to already be in the staking manager, and they revert because the manager balance is still zero.
Attack walkthrough#
- The validator is funded with 1,000 HYPE.
deactivateValidatorsetsrequestedto 1,000 and clearsactive.- No transfer runs. The validator balance is still 1,000. The manager balance is 0.
- The control manager deactivates and calls
processValidatorWithdrawals. - The control validator pushes 1,000 HYPE to its manager and ends at 0.
Diagrams#
Impact#
1,000 HYPE is stuck on the deactivated validator. The staking manager cannot complete the rebalance it just recorded. The control path delivers that 1,000 to the manager.
PoC#
cd 58610-h-02-validatormanager-missing-fund-withdrawal-from-validator_exp
forge test -vv
test_exploit_deactivate_leaves_1000 asserts the validator still holds 1,000e18, the manager received 0, and the control manager received 1,000e18.
Sources#
- AuditVault finding: https://github.com/Auditware/AuditVault/blob/main/findings/58610-h-02-validatormanager-missing-fund-withdrawal-from-validator.md
- Pashov report: https://github.com/pashov/audits/blob/master/team/md/Kinetiq-security-review_2025-02-26.md
Sources & further analysis#
Reproductions & code
- Standalone PoC + full trace: 58610-h-02-validatormanager-missing-fund-withdrawal-from-validator_exp (evm-hack-registry mirror).
- AuditVault finding: 58610-h-02-validatormanager-missing-fund-withdrawal-from-validator.
Alerts & third-party analyses
These dashboards index community alerts tweets, post-mortems, and independent write-ups. Reach them through the protocol name above to cross-check this reproduction against other analyses.